About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

OBAMA AWARENESS MONTH...

I've noticed that almost every topic and subject matter now has an "Awareness Month". So, I thought , why not have an "Obama" awareness month?  Therefore, I am declaring that this month is "National Obama Is An Empty Suit Awareness Month". If you are someone who wears a suit regularly please be sure to carry an extra "empty" suit around with you this month in order to focus awareness on this important subject matter. Communities are encouraged to organize "Empty" rallies where you can donate an empty suit to your local ACORN chapter manager to be distributed to all the empty spaces occupied by the voters they have registered who don't exist. A spokesperson for the New York City branch of ACORN which is called the "Volunteer Organization for Mobilizing Indigent Turnout" (VOMIT) said today they have registered 500 homeless street vagrants as Democrats and urged them to the polls for Obama. ACORN executive Ahma Lyre, the Senior Manager in charge of hiding Obama's connections with ACORN said they would be happy to donate any empty "Obama suits" they receive to VOMIT as an incentive for thier indigent voter drive. In a statement released this morning, Lyre said the following;

"We need to work together as fraud inciters and scheming liars to insure that Barack Obama has a massive support network of stupefied homeless drunks,burned out drug addicts, corpses, convicts, cartoon characters and unverifiable polling data to prop him up all the way to the White House. He promised us that we would be setting the agenda for his administration and we intend to carry him there no matter how much fraud we need to commit. We will work with "President" Obama on reshaping this country into a social playground for our liberal indoctrination agenda."

So let's make sure everyone is "aware" this month that Obama's real record is one of radical social activism, alliance with fraud-manipulating community organizations and terror sympathizers, with a real congressional track of vote avoidance and lack of leadership.

By the way... Where oh where has Senator Biden gone? We've been hearing a lot lately from the media about Sarah and the allegedly hate-filled rallies full of rabble rousing peasants with torches and pitchforks..., but an ominous emptiness from the Biden front. Could he have been proving to be a bit of a liability to THE ONE? Have Obama's poll numbers been rattled by the nonsense from Biden's mouth? McCain should have asked him about that at the Debate.  I suspect Obama daily regrets having selected Biden as his running mate.
 
- Mike Silverman

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TWO CASINOS - AND YOU WILL LOSE AT BOTH

How much of a gambler are you?  A gambler who knows what he's doing never sits down at a table unless he knows the game inside and out, understands the odds, and is willing to lose his wager. A presidential election is like gambling at the blackjack table in Vegas. Except the odds on drawing a winning hand are a lot longer, and the stakes are the future of the country, not just the cash you happen to have at hand. The presidential campaigns are the owners of the casinos trying to lure you in. At the end of the day, one casino will close up for good, the other will stay in business.  You can go in and play thier games, but unlike the possibilities in a real casino, even if you win... you still lose. If you win by keeping your chosen casino in business, the casino still takes money from you.., it may take more than before, or it may take less, but you will always give up something in the form of tax. You can pull out of a blackjack game, if you find yourself losing. There's no pulling out of the game after an election. You are in it for at least 4 years, unless you move to another country. Ultimately, your only choices come down to, what percentage of your money will these casinos take from you, and what will they do with that money. These are both questions that tie directly into the moral compass of the individuals running the casinos. Considering that the stakes are so much higher, Would you use at least the same level of caution..., that you would approach a game of poker or any game of chance..., with how you approach electing a Presidential candidate? To some people ,shockingly, that answer is no. They're star-struck by the flashy neon sign, they're distracted by the floor show, they get thier free drinks, and that's all it takes. They don't care about the past performance of their casino. They don't care what shady characters are behind the scenes or what is done with the money the casino takes from them. They're not interested in how lax the security system is, not concerned about what dangerous people in the world might be plotting an attack on them. They're having a good time, and that's all that matters. This is the Obama/Biden campaign.  It's all about distraction. It's all about the floor show, and the drunken revelry of feel-good empty rhetoric.  So, what about the McCain/Palin campaign? What are they doing in thier casino? is there any difference? Yes. This casino has a record that it doesn't try to hide. The owners are not shady people with questionable connections, and have offered to take far less from you than that other casino wants to take, and have your personal safety as one of thier primary concerns. I wanted to make this analogy to point out that knowing the track record and the character of the people behind the scenes is important. Questioning Obama's links with Rezko, Ayers, Wright, and ACORN, is key to determining trust in leadership. The attempt is being made right now to try to drain the topic of morality out of the election. Almost all the pundits now are trying to convince the electorate that past associations are not important, only the ideas of the moment are important, that a person's moral choices in thier personal life is not a reflection of thier ability to make the right choices for an entire nation of people.  But the examination of all the candidate's past associations is in fact highly relevant when selecting a leader on this scale. It's vital to be clear on what motivates the candidate to make a decision.  The attempt to steer the discussion away from Obama's past connections is part of the campaign of deflection and deceit. Nobody should be buying the media line that it's only a distraction from the issues. Character and morality is itself an issue, and the attempt to sweep it under the rug is the distraction.

- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

REZKO, WRIGHT, AYERS, ACORN - NAIL THEM DOWN!

All the pseudo-intellectual pundits and  news media anchors are saying that Obama's connections to Rezko, Ayers, Wright, and ACORN are irrelevent and talking about them will redound negatively for McCain/Palin.  Stick to the issues... they say.  The only thing that people care about is our country's economy, ...they say.   So, the press insists McCain and Sarah Palin only talk about... what the media experts want them to talk about.  Now, that's just very odd. If you think about this. If the press, who are in bed with Obama, are seeing real evidence that talking about Obama's deranged associations and friends and coworkers will impact McCain in a bad way..., why would they want to warn McCain of that?  Shouldn't they be standing back and allowing McCain to make that BIG mistake and fall flat on his face as a result?   Who, Who, Who ( my impression of an owl...) is such a blank mind that he can honestly listen to Obama say that he had no knowledge of Rezko's criminal behavior, no knowledge of Ayer's connection to domestic terrorism, no knowledge of Pastor Wright's fire-breathing hateful anti-American rhetoric, no knowledge of ACORN registering felons who are not allowed to vote and being involved in embezzlement and deceptive practices by setting up non-profit fronts allegedly to counsel poor urban folks on how to avoind predatory lending but funneling the government grant money into thier political activities instead. ( Obama worked for ACORN in several roles, as a "trainer" of ACORN's staff and represented them in a civil legal battle)... and believe he has no knowledge of any of this?  If we are to believe him in that, then he is frighteningly disconnected from his own real world activities and can not be trusted to be an executive or any sort of administrator because of sheer ignorance of his own associations. However, we don't believe him because it's simply not plausible that he had no knowledge of these things.  So, if you believe he's lying about who his mentors were, who he worked with in forming his political world view , and who he supported, there's no honest reason to trust him as the most powerful political leader of the free world.  Rather than withdraw from openly talking about the friends, confidants, and business associates of Obama, NOW is the time to drive the point home that this man is an anti-American socialist enabler of those who seek the downfall of American Conservative vaules.  Also drive home the social progressive plans he has for the country, but don't let him get away with hiding who he has sold his soul to for political advantage.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »