About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

TOILET PAPER TYRANNY

I've never heard Obama sound so negative on the future and economy and then spin his own agenda as being so positive, such a dichotomy of contradictive statements, as he did in his most recent speech.  Is this the hope and change he campaigned on?
 
Regarding the real effect of government intervention, this is why we are seeing grass roots tea parties all around the country today.  I'm heartened by the idea of these rallies, but at the same time I'm concerned that they may not get the attention they deserve. The only real effect these tea parties will have is if they can inspire and rally more and more citizens to the cause of pushing back the grip that the Obama administration has put on our private enterprise and economic freedom.  In no way will these wonderful , inspired rallies turn Obama, Frank, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd et-al into a fiscally conservative bunch. The exercise of freedom of the press and to demonstrate and protest and to exercise freedom of association and also to celebrate the real meaning of freedom are meant to give those who feel helpless against what's happening in our federal government a voice with which to be heard, and a call to arms of a sort. The liberal press will not stop being liberal, and the spinning at CNN , NBC, and all the left lurching media will be in full bloom in the face of these gatherings, but this is a foundational war. It's a war to save our way of life from being destroyed by a terrible mistake made by..., us...., by our nation... in electing a terrible representative of the people. President Obama does not reflect our country's ideals, foundational principles or love of freedom. With his fascist agenda of government intervention in every aspect of our lives, and his hatered of free enterprise and his loathing of those who have succeeded and reaped the rewards of wealth that freedom can bring, and his congress of yes-men who genuflect to his altar of tyranny, he is bent on using the Constitution of our country as his personal roll of toilet paper while wagging his finger in disgust at those of us who he thinks are too ignorant to understand his great schemes of reshaping the country in his image. Our founding documents are not waste material to be thrown into a recycling bin and remade into something else. If the President does not respect every page and word of the Constitution he has sworn to defend, then his word and his promise means nothing at all.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HANGING THOMAS JEFFERSON...,

The crux of the debate regarding GM and Chrysler and AIG and all the others is not the minutia of should the CEO be fired or not, the debate is on the principles of government's role versus the role of private business.  If we don't look at that, then we lose to the central planners, to the big government socialists who want our attention diverted precisely to the smaller argument of who should be running GM at the top, and the bonuses at AIG, and not the debacle of government taking over operations of privately owned business. I know it's difficult , with all the excitement and controversy, to step back and keep the big picture in focus, but if we lose that big picture we lose everything. This not a random romp by government egos who are trying to help one or two businesses stay afloat, this is nothing short of a complete flip of the government's role in limited interference. You have to understand that our freedom as citizens depends entirely on a very limited role of a central government. Up until the Obama Presidency, we have had some measure of restraint on this front. There has been a weak, but maintained modicum , a spark of respect for the principles of self determination and freedom to succeed or fail, allowing capitalism to absorb the failures and make successes from them.   But mass ignorance, driven by populist emotions have carried a radical socialist to the highest chair in government, and given him a fully functional right and left arm in the Senate and the House or Representatives that are working in conjunction with him put a hangman's noose around the necks of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Ben Franklin and all the founders of our nation whose brilliance long ago gave us a foundation of freedom to grow a nation upon. We are fast forgetting what freedom is and what it means to lose it.   It was those great figures from our past who declared their freedom from a self ordained Monarch, a singular power-grabbing authority who in some ways is very like Barack Obama today. The founders of our nation were willing to fight to have their freedom from an oppressive King and to be able to choose their own destinies, to rise or fall by the merit of their individual efforts rather than to have their futures and lives determined by an overlord. The fight is not about whether AIG should give out bonuses, or GM should lose it's CEO, it's about whether we rule ourselves, or the government rules us.  It's about whether we declare for freedom, or lay down and let the central government crush us under it's boot heel. We need to remember how to be free, and not willingly tie puppet strings to our own arms and legs and let our government play us like fools in a side show in the name of saving us from ourselves.

- Mike Silverman

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RE-DECLARING OUR INDEPENDENCE

 
The Declaration of Independence: ( WITH NOTES ADDED BY ME... in parenthesis)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal... ( this includes the executives at AIG, the management and employees of Wal Mart, speculators in the stock market, and people at all income levels from the wealthiest to those with no income)...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life ( abortion is not a "right") , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness ( the amount of money at your disposal increases the ease at which you can pursue liberty and happiness, thus the more you are taxed the more the government chokes your options for such pursuits) .--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ...( our government is not there to rule us, we own it, it functions at our discretion and we will reign it in when it goes too far)..., --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,...( ...when our government tries to determine the fate, future and obligations of the people and forgets that it's role is to serve rather than to limit freedom...) it is the Right of the People to alter ...( elect new leaders)... or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes ( .. the Constitution must not be ignored as a matter of convenience )...; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government( ... or perhaps restore to primary importance the founding principles and guiding documents of a great Republic to govern as was the original intent by replacing corrupt leaders with those who respect the Constitution)... The history of the present King of Great Britain ...( or perhaps... the present political leaders in DC )..is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.

 This first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence lays out the basic reasons for pursuing redress of grievances against a government that has gone out of control.  My notes inserted into it were meant simply to point out the modern equivalence of some of those grievances. It seems that  far too many of our elected leaders have forgotten or forsaken the principles and ideas of our nation's founding. We have a governing body now that seems to have lost its way from the principles primarily embodied in the right to liberty. Freedom. From freedom all the rest of it becomes possible.
 
- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA WON

Obama won. He likes to remind us of that when Conservatives criticize his stimulus package. But, just because he won., doesn't mean we need to stand by and allow him to drive down the economy even further with huge frivilous spending. Ostensibly, loans for purchasing homes were given to many people who could not afford them, in order to help them obtain the "American dream". At least that was the cloak in which these bad loans were made and were encouraged to be made by the Federal government telling private banks they "had" to allow this or face penalties. But, in light of this boondoggle of a stimulus that is "allegedly" somehow supposed work to undo the damage done by this policy, we all need to ask ourselves, what is that "American dream"? Is it simply owning your own home...? Or is it achieving a financial level of indpendence... that then permits you to afford owning your own home? The American dream since the country was founded has been individual freedom. Without that , we have nothing. Zip, zero, nada, nothing.The freedom to work and save for the things you want in life is inherent in the greatness of our country. People should not be thought of as "deprived" simply because they can't afford to buy and maintain a house. But.., we have a country and a population that has turned freedom on its head. Instead of being free to work hard and save and earn the things you want to have in life, many people now feel entitled to anything they want simply because they are United States citizens. It's no longer about working to achieve, but feeling entitled , demanding entitlements, and then figuring out later how to handle paying for it or be given an out with some tax funded program. As a population we seem to feel entitled to a house, entitled to a lifetime of medical care, entitled to well paying jobs, entitled to attend college, and entitled to an endless line of credit to get whatever we want regardless of the means to pay for it. This is a huge challenge to overcome. The government does not owe individuals a particular standard of living, and our earnings should not be taxed for the purpose of granting such percieved entitlements as owning a home. Now, Obama's boondoggle of a stimulus law is pure socialist manure and we should be worried that he was so easily able to get this passed through congress. The radicals like Obama have it backwards. We do not work for him, he works for us. Our job as citizens is not to provide him with an endless river of taxes to build his socialist playground with while he and his cronies decide how much of our earned money we are entitled to keep for ourselves. Cutting income taxes and captial gains taxes would be a huge boost to helping people be able to "AFFORD" owning thier own home.
 
If we have to have a mortgage bailout... ( and I don't think that we have to...) then here's my plan to help people who can no longer afford to pay thier mortgage.  It's much better than Obama's plan... and it's astoundingly simple, and it does not penalize anyone, and it helps every home owner who has a mortgage.  Tax forgiveness. Instead of taking tax money from paul to pay peter so that peter can meet his mortgage obligations, reduce all person's federal income tax by a level equivalent to their mortgage payment, to allow every person to meet thier mortgage... for the remaining term of the mortgage. After which time these people's income tax is restored to the standard level for thier income. Selling the house would require to pay back federal income tax equal to the amount that was forgiven. Make this plan optional , so that people who are paying mortgages can opt-in or opt-out at any time ( and as many times as they feel is needed) during the length of thier mortgage. This way the amount that they would have to pay back in tax upon selling the house is up to the individual who can choose at periods of time to take on the full mortgage burden himself at his normal income tax rate, thereby elminiating the tax payback for that period of time, and/or switch to the tax forgiveness option to reduce full burden of the mortgage. This also helps those who have already been foreclosed by helping them through reduced taxes to obtain a new mortgage.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FREEDOM GOES ON A BUMPY RIDE

There are generally two schools of thought regarding bullies. The first approach is to take them head-on and show them you will not tolerate being abused. The other approach is to ignore them, don't feed thier ego, and eventually they give up. It's been soundly proven that the second approach is almost always an abysmal failure. Ignoring the bully either entices him to be even more brazen in his attacks, or it appears to give the bully credibility since you won't defend yourself..., or both. So why bring this up? Sarah Palin has been bullied by the press, by Hollywood, by every Democrat pundit, from nearly the very first day that McCain announced her as his choice for a running mate. Her children, her husband, her stature as a mother, her intelligence, have been ridiculed in the way a mindless bully attempts to ridicule who he perceives to be the most defenseless target on the playground. As a politician a certain amount of this comes with the job, and you have to allow it to roll off your back..., to a degree. But there comes a time when it's reached its limit and the bullies need to be taught a lesson. When people who were on your side are turned against you launching the most petty, snide, cowardly, immature attacks from deep in the shadows, helping your enemies to tear you down, it's time to go after those traitors. Senator McCain proves again he is an absolutely bitter ingrate and a waste of time, as he sits idly by allowing lies from his own campaign staffers to be tossed at Governor Palin. Why? Because he never liked Conservatives and thinks they are the problem with the Republican Party. Sarah Palin worked harder than McCain himself in the last nine weeks of the campaign, to try to get him elected. And everyone I know thinks it's also disgraceful that Fox News drools this garbage all over it's network without first waiting for a response from governor Palin so that it can be presented as a fair and balanced report. Cameron should be fired for his hack journalism in aiding this spreading of innuendo and lies and violating the credo of his own network's slogan of fair and balanced.

Also have you heard of Obama's plan to force all public school students to perform community service? This is the sort of thing courts punish criminals with. Obama wants to do this to students. Obama said... "So when I'm President, I will set a goal for all American middle and high school students to perform 50 hours of service a year, and for all college students to perform 100 hours of service a year. This means that by the time you graduate college, you'll have done 17 weeks of service.". So what is this supposed to be, Obama's forced labor camps? Will the students have to wear t-shirts with Obama's image on them while they perform thier forced labor? What's next? Every school room must have a portrait of Obama on the wall that the students have to salute? Looks like we better hold on tight. The Obama presidency is going to be a very bumpy ride for those who cherish freedom.

 - Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AL-QAEDA'S MONUMENT TO MURDER STILL STANDS

Mr. Chertoff, Secretary Of Homeland Security said that our nation's airlines are still at risk for assault by terrorists. Iran is still proceeding with development of its nuclear program. Venezuelan "President" Hugo Chavez is cavorting with terrorists ( FARC,  Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia ). The Taliban are pushing hard to try to take back Afghanistan. Just to present a few examples. Terrorism is still on its savage Jihad around the globe..., and one of its monuments, a square in lower Manhattan in New York, still stands. Every day that goes by while the raising of a new World Trade Center ( to be called the Freedom Tower) stumbles awkwardly along without progress is simply another day that we allow a towerless square monument to mass murder crafted by the terror organization called Al-Qaeda to stand mutely mocking our agonizingly slow resolve to come together to dispense with one of thier evil footprints on our country. Yes, I know there are logistical problems and tremendous financial costs, but it's been 7 years now.  It's long past time to raise the Freedom Tower. Estimates are that it won't be completed until 2012. Let's see if we can at least keep to that date.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »