About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

AN UNWORTHY LIFE ?

What is the significance of life?  Is it to be useful in some way? To plow fields, to feed the hungry, to bring happiness to others, to invent, to heal, or in some way be of value to the world? what if a man is paralyzed, immobile, his arms and legs frozen forever? Perhaps he can hear and see and speak, but lets rob him even of his eyes and his voice. He is paralyzed and blind and mute. He can hear and he can breathe. All other senses fail him utterly. Perhaps he has been this way for as long as he has been alive. Does his life have any vaule? What is the significance of the life within him?
 
Perhaps there are those who would seek to help him. They would learn how to care for such a man, to provide him with what he needs to survive, and how to communicate with such a man who is so shut off from manners of expressing himself. Perhaps there are those who would love him for the life within him, for its own sake. Perhaps by caring for him, they would learn to care for others and to respect life in a deeper way. But then, is he merely significant as a tool to teach others something?  Does he have to be something to someone else, or can his life mean something important even if no one cares for him?
 
Let's move to the end of his life, he dies, and no one has noticed. His lifeless body stiffens and grows cold in his bed and days pass before anyone discovers him. He is then taken away and laid to rest in the earth. what can we say about the time during which life inhabited his body?
 
He did not choose to be born, birth comes absent of the knowledge of the one being born. And certainly he did not choose to come into the world with such a condition afflicting him. Yet, into the world he came. The earth was solid under him, the sun shone on him as on everyone else, and the wind touched him no less or more than it touched anyone else. Creation did not judge him. So what man can say he knows better than all of creation? If the world and the universe and all of existence was willing to accept his birth, is a man better able to judge if his life is acceptable?
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

YOU MAY NOT LIKE THIS - MY OPINION ON ABORTION

As always, blogs are primarily repositories of opinion, and so let me preface what I am about to relate by stating that this is purely my most heartfelt opinion. If you are too sensitive to face reading an opinion that is dramatically opposed to abortion, then I suggest you go read something else, for you will not like what follows here, you might even find that my opinion is shocking. I will begin by making a simple observation. The most innocent, the most untouched by the demands the joys the wonders and the sorrows of human society, the purest moments of existence for a human are those precious moments before, during, and then after birth when a child takes his or her first few breaths. Like a falling snowflake pure and unique, it begins a journey that will eventually change it, merge it into a greater conglomerate of snowflakes till the child may seem to disappear in the masses of society. And yet, like that snowflake, it adds a little something to the overall depth and strength and volume of our world. Of course a child is far more complex, has far more potential and life than a mere snowflake. To see and hear a child newly born, crying out, reaching out to the world around it as that child takes it's first tentative grasp of a new experience outside of the womb is a moving experience for anyone with a human heart. Along with the divine spark of life that was passed to that child from the parents, within that child rests a potential for achievements as yet untapped. With caring and guidance and love, that child will have a chance to learn and dream and reach for highest potential of the human spirit. How then, any loving person can make a deliberate choice to kill... to wipe out, destroy in horrific fashion that purest, most innocent of human life before it has the chance to even take those first few precious breaths, to reach out into the world with those small hands, to have a chance to bear witness to creation, that innocent life depending on its mother for protection, a mother who commits either of her own will or under the heavy handed influence of others to that most wretched and vile act of savage and brutal betrayal, is beyong my reckoning for it seems to be an act completely without human comapssion. Which brings me to the point of my soliloquy. Recently the news media has been telling us of the murder of Doctor George Tiller, a commited abortionist who had no qualms about ripping innocent helpless life to shreds thousand times. He has openly declared it, seeming to be pround of the fact, that he has done this thousands of times. No infamous serial killer has been as prolific or heartless as this dreadful man. The difference is that the law, sadly, protected this murderous villian in most of the cases. What of the family Dr. Tiller leaves behind?  You may think me cruel to offer my opinion in such a fashion at a time when they most likely are greiving the loss, but in my opinion there is in fact no time in which the truth of the matter should be hidden, avoided, swept under the rug, or aborted. I feel sad for his family, those who loved him and who feel the pain of losing a loved one. I hope that as they pray for his soul, they will also take a moment to pray for the hepless and innocent souls who as a doctor, a profession people look to for healing, he betrayed and crassly ripped from this world and suffed out. Just so there is no misunderstanding, murder is wrong, always. Whether it takes the form of building a gruesome mountain of abortions, or if it takes the form of murdering the murderer. Tiller will face his ultimate judgement before God. I will conclude with this thought, there is no case, no time, no circumstance when a fetus, a human life, a baby in the womb should ever be deliberately aborted. Not even at the cost of the mother's life. Again, my blog... my opinion.  If you disagree you are welcome to respond.

- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA AT NOTRE DAME - BORING AND POLITICAL

Obama's speech at Notre Dame;

If you love Obama, voted for him, etc.. you probably loved his speech.
 
If you opposed his presidency, policies and actions as President, you probably will find a lot to criticize about it.
 
Personally, I found it to be too long, I was bored by the end of it, and it meandered in various topics that didn't seem quite relevent to the graduating class, especially when he went on and on about how there is such injustice and inequity and greed in our country talking down the United States again as he so loves to do. It was filled with political campaign rhetoric. And, it would have been a nice gesture if, with all his flowery rhetoric about finding common ground and trying to reach hearts and minds, if he had acknowledged specifically the 50 or so students who through principled disagreement with the University's decision to award him an honorary degree decided to hold a separate ceremony of their own outside. He could have wished them well , and that would have been a decent thing to do. But he didn't. And of course, in his comments about his receiving the honorary degree he made a joke of it, saying how he's only 1 for 2, only getting 1 honorary degree out of two graduation addresses so far as President and said he would have to ask the Notre Dame University President for tips on how to get more.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HEALTH CARE, THE CIA, AND NOTRE DAME


Hello Again.  I'm not sure if anyone reads my blog anymore, but I thought I'd post a few thoughts about recent events.
 
* President Obama speaking at Notre Dame's graduation ceremony  ;
 
Personally, I don't have a problem with this. I strongly support of freedom of speech as a natrual right for all citizens of the US and all people of the world.  But then, I don't attend Notre Dame. It's a matter for the school administration and it's students and alumni to determine who their guest speakers should be.  It seems that what bothers most of the people who are protesting his appearence there, is less the fact that he is going address the graduating students, but that he is being given an honorary law degree from the university, an institution of the Catholic Church whose teachings are diametrically opposed to Presiden't Obama's view on abortion. This I can certainly understand. President Obama clearly supports the most radical pro-choice policies of the left, and faithful Catholics strongly oppose abortion. It's one matter to have the President make an address to an assembly of students, it's quite another to honor him with a special degree from an institution whose teachings are to the opposite on such a dramatically important matter as abortion.  A reasonable compromise from the school's administration would seem to be to have the President speak, but do not give him the degree.  I have listened to some of the student protesters who said they would be satisifed with that. President Obama, as a goodwill gesture, should perhaps choose to decline accepting the honorary degree in light of the obvious turmoil it is causing. It would be a dignified thing to do, and could be a catalyst in defusing the tensions over this. I hope he will do that, though I suspect he probably will accept the degree.  As a final comment on this controvesy, it's interesting to note how the news media is making this into an isolated controversy between people of the Catholic faith, and President Obama.  Millions of US citizens who are not of the Catholic faith, such as myself, also are strongly opposed to the cultre of abortion-on-demand , and oppose President Obama's stance on the matter.
 
* Speaker Of The house, Nancy Pelosi's argument with the "CIA";
 
This is ridiculous. I watched the news report in which she was asked if the CIA lied to her. When she uttered the word "yes" I thought she would immediately catch it as a mistaken thing to say, and rescind it in the same statement.  She didn't. She stood by it. I don't want to wast too much commentary on this, since it is such a dramatically rookie-type, neophyte knee-jerk silly thing for her to have alleged, that it pretty much speaks volumes for itself. You don't kick the dog that's guarding your house. Congress relies on the CIA for important intelligence briefings on the status of our country's security. Pelosi has forced the CIA to defend itself now, since by remaining silent they would in essence be submitting that they lied to her. Thus she has started a war, and put herself directly in the middle of it. Pelosi has had reign over the House Of Representatives similar to what a queen matriarch would have over her kingdom. She undoubtedly was feeling her power, feeling untouchable.  But as Elloit Ness proved to Al Capone, even the biggest and the badest can be knocked from their pedestal. Capone picked a fight with the wrong guy, and Pelosi has made a similar mistake.
 
* National Health Care, Obama-Style;
 
Well, what's to be said that hasn't been said already? President Obama recently demanded , and got a vague promise in return, that the nation's hospitals and drug companies  and insurance agencies reduce health care costs by $2 trillion over 10 years. That's hysterical coming from a man who just asked for a nearly 4 trillion dollar budget made of tax payer's money. A man who has already spent generations of tax money that hasn't even been collected yet.  What huge arrogance and hipocrisy on display. Of course, his biggest plan is for every man woman and child to have government run health insurance. Anyone who has had to deal with medicare or the VA for any major issue knows the nightmare he wants to inflict universally on the country.  No thanks.  Transparent prices of services and medications, consumers choosing their own policies as best fits their lifestyle rather than leaving it up to the government or an employer, and tort reform are some of the keys to reducing medical costs as well as allowing the individual in conjuction with the doctor to choose the medical services they require rather than some nameless faceless insurance or government bureaucrat.
 
- Mike Silverman
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA EXPOSES THE DISEASE OF LIBERALISM

By now most people who have been paying attention have heard Obama's convoluted response to the question of when life begins at the Faith Forum at Saddleback Church and have probably also heard of his refusal to vote in favor of a bill against infanticide in the event of a botched abortion where the baby survived. If it's shocking to you that babies born alive from an attempted medical abortion procedure are then deliberately killed outside the womb, good.. it "should" be shocking. A federal bill passed the house and senate and was signed into law in 2002 stopping the practice permitting the killing of babies who survived an abortion procedure.  But Barak Obama refused to sign onto a similar bill at the state level in Illinois. He voted against the bill twice fearing that such a law protecting babies would limit a woman's so-called right to an abortion. He shelved the bill while chairman of a Senate committe that was scheduled to hear it, allowing the bill to die. This is not about Obama's personal life, or Obama's wife, or all the things that liberals claim we have no right to criticize.  The deliberate killing ( also known as murder) of a baby is inexcusable, there is no time or place or reasoning that makes it right. People can debate when life begins, but no one of this world should ever suggest there is anything less than the full protection of law afforded to any baby living outside the womb. The positive aspect of Obama's words and actions are that they expose the disease known as Liberalism for what it is. It is a disease of the soul that destroys the second greatest gift God gave to man, the ability to reason the difference between right and wrong. The greatest gift being life itself. You know, an animal, let's say a tiger for example, instinctively attacks anyone who appears to be a threat to her children. Even an animal instinctively understands that those babies are vital. I'm not trying to put animals on equal footing here, but merely pointing out that even in the lowest forms of life the instinct to protect the baby is a powerful and overwhelming instinct. Liberalism denies the nature of this vital instinct in humans. In an attempt to equivocate life as a matter of convenience to the lowest common denominator, the avowed liberal has taken that greatest of all gifts, the chance to experience as a human being the earth and the universe that God made, and terminated it with extreme prejudice. God gave us life as a way of being part of the greatness of his creation. What emptiness of the soul motivates some to deny that chance to any concieved human child? Even if you don't believe in God, understanding that the greatest achievements of mankind are still undiscovered because they will be achieved by future generations, that every successful birth extends the "potential" of humankind to the benefit of all people is a fundamental understanding that should take no great intellectual effort to reason out. Is it wiser to plan for birth?  Of course. But that does not mean unplanned births produce disposable babies. The challenge is not to find a way to get rid of babies who were born unplanned for, but to reduce unplanned births by engaging in committed relationships , limiting the temptation to engage in casual sexual relationships. That, of course is antithetical to liberal teachings that assume we all will "do it" as often as possible and do it as young as possible. Aligning sexual behavior with moral value is key to reducing unwanted pregnancies, but to drive that message we need to undo the damage that progressive-liberal philosophy has attempted to drill into society.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »