About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

OBAMA - EXPOSED


You and I and lot's of ordinary citizens, including those of us who didn't go to Harvard, can see that President Obama's policies are highly flawed, which begs the question of why does he want to continue with a failed approach. We MUST assume that he is intelligent enough to assess the impact of his economic spending thus far. And if he can see that, then there is another agenda at work than "saving" the economy. The question is , what exactly does he hope to accomplish with such a destructive agenda. Unemployment numbers are still rising, the spending of revenues that already are deeply in the red by the government is still increasing for the alleged purpose of "saving jobs" and "restoring" the economy, including the ludicrous notion that government run healthcare will restore economic balance. Obama is fond lately of declaring that he is not interested in running car manufacturers or banks, and yet... he has had a strong and deliberate hand in the creation of new bureaucracies to oversee and control the standards Obama has demanded for GM, Chrysler and Executive pay.  He himself may not be doing the "runnning" of the banks and industries, but his lackeys are, and that makes him in essence doing exactly so by proxy. Again we need to return now to the vital question, since Obama's policies are only destined to make economic recovery slower and more painful for the country... and this he surely knows otherwise we would have to consider him to be a monumental idiot...,  what then is his "real" agenda? There are many possibilities, but my best educated guess based on his behavior is two-fold, first that President Obama believes that Capitalism is the root of all evil in our economy. By putting heavy handed controls and reigns on businesses, banks, and even manufacturers he hopes to create an outcome based solution for investments that minimizes risk and balances dividends in a manner that he sees as fair. He seems to believe that those who invest and lose due to circumstances beyond their control are victims of deciet rather than legitimate risk takers who made a value judgement on thier choice of investment and therefore should suffer no loss for making a poor choice ( for example , buying a home when you can't afford one). However, this viewpoint is broken down along social lines by Obama.  If the investor is a Hedge Fund and the dividends owed to people invested in it has any influence on the fate of any particular blue collar workforce, ( aka: GM...), then the laborer is placed on the pedestal and the investor is demonized. Obama works off of a heirarchy or pyramid chart of who is most important in society. It begins with the common laborer at the top, and ends with the top executives in large businesses at the bottom.  Furthermore, he looks at high executive pay as unfair because he has been institutionalized to the proletariat plight, which in essense rates the low level or blue collar labor force a more valuable contributer to society than the white collar or executive and that one man's salary should be no more or less than another's depsite the contribution. I believe this has been ingrained to his thinking since his earliest experiences, and is proven by his seemingly irrational approach to resolving social and economic problems. So his goal is not common sense free market based solutions,  it is a re-restructuring from the ground-up of the rollercoaster ride that risk taking by it's nature is subject to. This is an approach doomed to failure, but it is a part of Obama's nature and upbringing to pursue it regardless.   The second primary reason he continues down a line of flawed policies is for the sake of loyalty to those who have always been the most supportive of him. The unions, the left wing special interests, the ACLU, ACORN, etc.  Also, those who aided in his rise feel they are owed and I'm sure have made it known to him what they expect in return.

 

- Mike Silverman


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TRAGIC - MORE PRIDE IN PARLIAMENT THAN IN CONGRESS?

Two days ago European Parliament member Daniel Hannan openly and eloquently and forcefully berated British Prime Minister Grodon Brown. Here are some quotes from his 3 minute speech while they were at a meeting 2 days ago during a session of Parliament in Strasbourg France....,
 
"The truth, Prime Minister, is that you have run out of our money.  The country as a whole is now in negative equity.  Every British child is born owing around 20,000 pounds.  Servicing the interest on that debt is going to cost more than educating the child.  Now, it's not that you're not apologizing.  Like everyone else I've long accepted that you're pathologically incapable of accepting responsibility for these things.  It's that you're carrying on willfully, worsening our situation, wantonly spending what little we have left.  Last year, in the last 12 months, a hundred thousand private sector jobs have been lost, and yet you've created 30,000 public sector jobs.  Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecedented engorgement of the unproductive bit." "You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.  And when you repeat in that wooden and perfunctory way that our situation is better than others, that we're well placed to weather the storm, I have to tell you, you sound like a Brezhnev era apparatchik giving the party line.  You know and we know, and you know that we know that it's nonsense!  Everyone knows that Britain is worse off than any other country as we go into these hard times.  The IMF has said so.  The European Commission has said so.  The markets have said so, which is why our currency has devalued by 30%, and soon the voters, too, will get their chance to say so.  They can see what the markets have already seen, that you are the devalued prime minister of a devalued government."
 
Now, I hate to say this, and I should be ashamed to admit this as a proud United States citizen, but I am more proud of that member of the European Parliament who stood up in front of the whole world and berated the British Prime Minister eloquently, forcefully and with clear rational language defending freedom and free market enterprise BETTER... that's right... BETTER and with more COURAGE than almost anyone in our congress or in our national press media has had the will power to do to President Obama and his cohorts, those who need that same exact berating before a national audience.., so that we can all see what Obama's response would be.  Would he just laugh it off like Gordon Brown did to Daniel Hannan?  Like Obama did in Leno? Or would he reply with his own eloquent defense of his budget, Ominbus, TARP, etc...?  I don't think Obama can logically or rationally defend all the spending he has signed into law and permitted to be spent. If that same memeber of the European Parliament who heroically stood up and defended AMERICAN market values and freedom... ( yes... he defended OUR homegrown market oriented values even though he was making the case for his own country I felt as if he were speaking for us as well..,)  if he stood up at an Obama press conference and said exactly the same thing to Obama..., I can tell you right now there would be cheers and applause thundering through this nation for that brave guy.  Isn't it rather sad that the type of hero we need in our government seems only to be found in a foreign governemnt... a governemnt ( by the way..) that Obama doesn't think the US has any special relationship with?  I'll tell you what, remember during the campaign McCain saying that there is no time for on the job training when it comes to being President? Look at the strain the Obama administration has managed to put on relationships with our own allies since he took office. I suppose it counts as "change" , ( though not for the better...), so where is the "hope' he promised? He seems to have thrown all hope out the window with massive rising debts that will be saddled with our children for generations. I would rather have that European Parliamentarian Daniel Hannan as our President than Barack Obama. At least Hannan understands economics and how not to add burden to a troubled economy. Now I want to also acknowledge a brave soul in our own government, Representative Michelle Bachmann of the House Financial Services Committee, who pressed Geithner to show her where in the United States Constitution the Treasury has the authority to take control of failing banks and seize private businesses that it feels are on the verge of failure, as he wants the power to do.  Geithner's answer was that it's constitutional because congress voted for it and the President signed it, which of course does not necessarily make a law nor the power granted by that law constitutional, it only points out that the "processes" of congress and the President are constitutional, not the resulting law.Geithner and Obama and Pelosi and Frank are pushing for the biggest takeover and intrusion by them into our country's privacy rights and private businesses in our nation's history.  This administration is pushing us down the drain into a black hole that will bankrupt us in less than a decade. 
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »