About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

OBAMA - EXPOSED


You and I and lot's of ordinary citizens, including those of us who didn't go to Harvard, can see that President Obama's policies are highly flawed, which begs the question of why does he want to continue with a failed approach. We MUST assume that he is intelligent enough to assess the impact of his economic spending thus far. And if he can see that, then there is another agenda at work than "saving" the economy. The question is , what exactly does he hope to accomplish with such a destructive agenda. Unemployment numbers are still rising, the spending of revenues that already are deeply in the red by the government is still increasing for the alleged purpose of "saving jobs" and "restoring" the economy, including the ludicrous notion that government run healthcare will restore economic balance. Obama is fond lately of declaring that he is not interested in running car manufacturers or banks, and yet... he has had a strong and deliberate hand in the creation of new bureaucracies to oversee and control the standards Obama has demanded for GM, Chrysler and Executive pay.  He himself may not be doing the "runnning" of the banks and industries, but his lackeys are, and that makes him in essence doing exactly so by proxy. Again we need to return now to the vital question, since Obama's policies are only destined to make economic recovery slower and more painful for the country... and this he surely knows otherwise we would have to consider him to be a monumental idiot...,  what then is his "real" agenda? There are many possibilities, but my best educated guess based on his behavior is two-fold, first that President Obama believes that Capitalism is the root of all evil in our economy. By putting heavy handed controls and reigns on businesses, banks, and even manufacturers he hopes to create an outcome based solution for investments that minimizes risk and balances dividends in a manner that he sees as fair. He seems to believe that those who invest and lose due to circumstances beyond their control are victims of deciet rather than legitimate risk takers who made a value judgement on thier choice of investment and therefore should suffer no loss for making a poor choice ( for example , buying a home when you can't afford one). However, this viewpoint is broken down along social lines by Obama.  If the investor is a Hedge Fund and the dividends owed to people invested in it has any influence on the fate of any particular blue collar workforce, ( aka: GM...), then the laborer is placed on the pedestal and the investor is demonized. Obama works off of a heirarchy or pyramid chart of who is most important in society. It begins with the common laborer at the top, and ends with the top executives in large businesses at the bottom.  Furthermore, he looks at high executive pay as unfair because he has been institutionalized to the proletariat plight, which in essense rates the low level or blue collar labor force a more valuable contributer to society than the white collar or executive and that one man's salary should be no more or less than another's depsite the contribution. I believe this has been ingrained to his thinking since his earliest experiences, and is proven by his seemingly irrational approach to resolving social and economic problems. So his goal is not common sense free market based solutions,  it is a re-restructuring from the ground-up of the rollercoaster ride that risk taking by it's nature is subject to. This is an approach doomed to failure, but it is a part of Obama's nature and upbringing to pursue it regardless.   The second primary reason he continues down a line of flawed policies is for the sake of loyalty to those who have always been the most supportive of him. The unions, the left wing special interests, the ACLU, ACORN, etc.  Also, those who aided in his rise feel they are owed and I'm sure have made it known to him what they expect in return.

 

- Mike Silverman


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA SAYS WE CAN FEEL GOOD ABOUT BEING MURDERED

  I watched the President's so-called press conference last night. First, I do not believe that the President does not want our government to have a controlling interest in as many major businesses as possible. His template is one of progressive liberalism. You heard him in the past, he wants to stop what he feels is corporate greed and Barney Frank and Chris Dodd want to stop businesses from any sort of financial practice that seems risky. Based on all the outrageous acts by the Treasury Secretary, Barney Frank and his gang and the President himself to tamp down and place controls on businesses, by their outrageous attempts to demonize any of the people who took bonuses to the point of actually putting them in physical danger, in fear of thier lives, I have to believe that the President very boldly lied at the press conference last night. With regard to government intrusion in GM and other car companies, they should stay out of it 100%. They have no businesses being in business. Period. For me it is not a negotiable idea. And, I am getting very sick, sick as can be... every time I hear our President climb up on his pedestal.., on his Greek column, and become the most pretentious pompous jackass that has ever held the office of President as he says how he is making us safer, and a better nation, by ridding the practice of hard interrogation used by the CIA. By saying that, here is what he is saying to you and me and the rest of us. Here is how he wants us to think and feel. The next time you hear a news report that a US commercial jet has been hijacked by Al-Qeuda terrorists and has been slammed into another skyscraper full of our fellow citizens, this time in Chicago, or perhaps San Francisco, or perhaps the city you or I work in, and.., perhaps your son or daughter or wife or father is in that structure... and you see images on the news of your family member leaping to his or her death from a 20th story window because flames caused by the attack are consuming everything and everyone around into piles of charred human remains... just remember one thing... at least no terrorist was tortured for the information that might have prevented it, and no terrorist will have to face harsh interrogation as a result, so please feel good about our values as a country, and don't forget to thank President Obama for making us a better nation for it.
 
I also want to address the idea of the United States sitting down to face to face unconditional talks with the leaders of enemy nations. One of the things we have as a nation with incredible success and power and wealth, is our stock as a presence in itself with whom a mutual meeting or conference with immediately lends credibility to the posture and leadership of the nations we meet and conference with. For foreign entities, meeting with high ranking members of our government is a privilege, not a right. It is an earned achievement, not a God granted liberty. We debase, weaken, and undercut the image , the integrity, and the strength of our name, our history and our position by throwing down with the lowest vermin in the world without condition. WE are the country who must set conditions to be met for those who wish to have the honor and prestige of negotiating with the greatest human power for liberty and democracy on earth. Obama has sold us out by giving up our image and prestige and power to the worms and ticks and other vermin who want to bleed us dry. He disgraces us when he does that. He is simply an insufferable fool who proves almost daily that he has no understanding of what it takes to be a leader. His popularity is going to wane, I think more quickly than anyone is willing to admit. A cult leader has his followers in his grip only till he makes a mistake that goes so deep that his followers have no choice but to be shocked by it. Remember Jim Jones and the People's Temple? Guyana, I think it was. They stayed with him until... he gave the order to start drinking the poison. Then, what did he have to do? He needed armed guards to keep people from fleeing as they tried to run from thier own forced suicides. Obama so very much reminds me of Jim Jones. His followers being led down the primrose path to thier government-enforced suicides for the sake of his own twisted glory. Obama is trying to make the country into his own version of Jim Jones' People's Temple and himself into an unchallengeable God.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TRAGIC - MORE PRIDE IN PARLIAMENT THAN IN CONGRESS?

Two days ago European Parliament member Daniel Hannan openly and eloquently and forcefully berated British Prime Minister Grodon Brown. Here are some quotes from his 3 minute speech while they were at a meeting 2 days ago during a session of Parliament in Strasbourg France....,
 
"The truth, Prime Minister, is that you have run out of our money.  The country as a whole is now in negative equity.  Every British child is born owing around 20,000 pounds.  Servicing the interest on that debt is going to cost more than educating the child.  Now, it's not that you're not apologizing.  Like everyone else I've long accepted that you're pathologically incapable of accepting responsibility for these things.  It's that you're carrying on willfully, worsening our situation, wantonly spending what little we have left.  Last year, in the last 12 months, a hundred thousand private sector jobs have been lost, and yet you've created 30,000 public sector jobs.  Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecedented engorgement of the unproductive bit." "You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.  And when you repeat in that wooden and perfunctory way that our situation is better than others, that we're well placed to weather the storm, I have to tell you, you sound like a Brezhnev era apparatchik giving the party line.  You know and we know, and you know that we know that it's nonsense!  Everyone knows that Britain is worse off than any other country as we go into these hard times.  The IMF has said so.  The European Commission has said so.  The markets have said so, which is why our currency has devalued by 30%, and soon the voters, too, will get their chance to say so.  They can see what the markets have already seen, that you are the devalued prime minister of a devalued government."
 
Now, I hate to say this, and I should be ashamed to admit this as a proud United States citizen, but I am more proud of that member of the European Parliament who stood up in front of the whole world and berated the British Prime Minister eloquently, forcefully and with clear rational language defending freedom and free market enterprise BETTER... that's right... BETTER and with more COURAGE than almost anyone in our congress or in our national press media has had the will power to do to President Obama and his cohorts, those who need that same exact berating before a national audience.., so that we can all see what Obama's response would be.  Would he just laugh it off like Gordon Brown did to Daniel Hannan?  Like Obama did in Leno? Or would he reply with his own eloquent defense of his budget, Ominbus, TARP, etc...?  I don't think Obama can logically or rationally defend all the spending he has signed into law and permitted to be spent. If that same memeber of the European Parliament who heroically stood up and defended AMERICAN market values and freedom... ( yes... he defended OUR homegrown market oriented values even though he was making the case for his own country I felt as if he were speaking for us as well..,)  if he stood up at an Obama press conference and said exactly the same thing to Obama..., I can tell you right now there would be cheers and applause thundering through this nation for that brave guy.  Isn't it rather sad that the type of hero we need in our government seems only to be found in a foreign governemnt... a governemnt ( by the way..) that Obama doesn't think the US has any special relationship with?  I'll tell you what, remember during the campaign McCain saying that there is no time for on the job training when it comes to being President? Look at the strain the Obama administration has managed to put on relationships with our own allies since he took office. I suppose it counts as "change" , ( though not for the better...), so where is the "hope' he promised? He seems to have thrown all hope out the window with massive rising debts that will be saddled with our children for generations. I would rather have that European Parliamentarian Daniel Hannan as our President than Barack Obama. At least Hannan understands economics and how not to add burden to a troubled economy. Now I want to also acknowledge a brave soul in our own government, Representative Michelle Bachmann of the House Financial Services Committee, who pressed Geithner to show her where in the United States Constitution the Treasury has the authority to take control of failing banks and seize private businesses that it feels are on the verge of failure, as he wants the power to do.  Geithner's answer was that it's constitutional because congress voted for it and the President signed it, which of course does not necessarily make a law nor the power granted by that law constitutional, it only points out that the "processes" of congress and the President are constitutional, not the resulting law.Geithner and Obama and Pelosi and Frank are pushing for the biggest takeover and intrusion by them into our country's privacy rights and private businesses in our nation's history.  This administration is pushing us down the drain into a black hole that will bankrupt us in less than a decade. 
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CRAWLING OUT OF THE DARKNESS....

We are not amused Mr. President, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Reid and Mr. Frank.  All the vitriol and hatered you are spewing at the AIG Corporation is not going to distract us from the fact that you have just spent this country into bankruptcy for the foreseeable future and accomplished nothing in the process. Your hypocritical ranting and raving at "executives" and bonuses is not going to make us forget about your socialist agenda to seize control of the healthcare industry, the banking industry, to force economically unsound environmental policies on businesses that will raise costs for all Americans, your rollback of laws designed to keep us safe from terrorism, and your irresponsible continuation of the banking regulations that required a percentage of loans to be granted to those who could not afford them.

Obama has , up to very recently, been ripping down the economy and saying that government is "the only one" that can fix it. He didn't actually disown that statement yet, that only government can fix it...  ( though he should reverse that idea )... but, trying to suddenly put a positive spin on the economy makes him come off as either hypocritical or a bit suspicious. When a politician "says" one thing and "acts" in the opposite manner, we have a leader who does not believe in his own words, and that is not a good thing.  Obama needs to back up his statement about people staying positive about the economy by showing that "he" is positive about the economy by stopping all government bailouts and letting the market go through natural corrections based on capitalism, and simply and plainly remove barriers to freedom by cutting taxes across the board and letting people keep more of thier own money and thus boost consumption to new heights. If he did that, I would be cheering him on. but he's not doing that. We know he won't do that, because he doesn't really believe in a free market system and wants to control the economic outcome of everyone's lives so that he, in his own mind, can play the hero , can play the savior of the country and institute the sort of socialist ideas he deeply believes in.  Recessions are cyclical and it will turn around regardless of Obama's and Pelosi's and Reid's hideous spending and ... , when it does eventually turn around Obama and his cohorts will lie about it by saying it was his stimulus package that caused the economy to rebound when in fact the so-called stimulus probably will be the cause of a "delay" in the economy rebounding.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA - ECONOMIC TERRORIST

People can, and often do, try to perpare themselves for potential disaster. When you're sitting in an airplane and the captain tells you to brace for impact, you do what you can.  You make sure you know where that flotation device is, you grip the arms of the seat, you pray... but the ground is coming up fast and you know there's nothing at all you can do to stop it. You just hold on tight and pray you survive. When Obama won the election, I knew what was coming.  You knew what was coming..., most of us who are Conservatives and politically aware , knew what was coming.  But to actually SEE it, to see the speed of that impact racing up to hit us in the face as it's doing right now... is just stunning.  It's devastating and heartbreaking. Obama is the plane crash we knew was coming, but the impact is no less powerful or disheartening because of that fore-knowledge. The Stimulus bill passing into law was like getting that announcement from the captain to brace for impact.  The 4 trillion dollar budget is like the point of impact, when the nose of the plane plunges into the tarmack, and the screams of the passengers are hard to hear over the sound of twisting metal and exploding fuel tanks. And it's only been a few months. To actually see the nightmare scenario of the stinking carcass of socialism and central planning rise up like a great tsunami with its shadow falling across the country, flush with life from an infusion of our taxes, is like somthing from a steven king horror movie.   We have to make progress in turning this beast around at the next mid-term election cycle, or it will bury us for generations. Obama is the only plane crash that has a cheering section. The liberals are toasting this plane crash and it just makes me sick to see it happening. Because he has a rubber-stamp Democrat majority, Obama basically has a free hand to destroy our way of life in a way that the terrorist enemies of our country can only dream of. And we can't stop him, except by voting him out when the time comes, or maybe weakening the numbers of congressional democrats at the next mid-term. Obama has proven..., that he will destroy our economy in the name of maintaining Democrat power, and his own power, if that's what it takes.
 
I heard Bob Shrum ( Democrat political consultant) today on the fox show Brian And The Judge say "the people don't care about the pork ( in the upcoming ominbus spending bill). It's trivial.". I was of course outraged that he would dare to say that. But this is the genuine attitude of these socialists. That in itself was a teachable moment to anyone who heard it. There are radical liberals who think that the masses want all this insane spending and don't care what it's being spent on. Shrum actually was trying to defend money for earmarks such as tattoo removal, and swine odor management. His argument..."hey, these things need funding , and they're important to someone...", and again he said "the people don't care about this.". Amazing. And I'm sure you heard Obama putting the screws to Bush as the goat for his liberal agenda. Obama and all his cohorts are going to blame Bush throughout this Presdiency as the scapegoat for anything they want to do. Obama is a coward, he doesn't have the testicular fortitude to stand up and admit this has always been what he wanted to do and that he would have done it regardless of Bush. Wouldn't it be nice to have a Conservative president articulating Conservatism..., rather than a phoney baloney radcial socialist hiding behind a thin veneer of Conservative language as he sells his goals of central planning? It just continues to emphasize the dysfunctional nature of liberalism, that it has to hide behind a Conservative couch for fear of being exposed. It is cowardly, menacing, decietful, you name it. It's disgusting.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT MCCAIN COULD HAVE DONE...

Senator McCain had a great opportunity to teach a large segment of the public a lesson in the real causes of the housing market slump. He had the opportunity to point out that the Democrats were trying to obfuscate thier own culpability by playing the traditional class warfare game and redirecting the blame to a vaguely defined "greed on Wall Street" as the boogeyman. He had the chance to point out that it was not de-regulation of financial markets that caused this problem, but it was precisely "bad regulation" of quasi public entities called FreddieMac and FannieMae in concert with bad legislation forcing loan eligibility to be determined by impossibly low standards, and all of it protected by Barney Frank who declared "''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''. McCain had the chance to point out that House Republicans introduced a bill in 2005 that would have reigned in the sick practices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but it was dead on arrival in the Senate because it lacked enough votes in the closely divided party line Senate to prevent Democrats from filibustering it. He had the opportunity to point out that top recipients of campaign contributions from these horribly mismanaged lending agencies included Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi. There was a lot that I wished he had said, that he didn't. I wasn't overly impressed with the debate.  There was little excitement, very little new from the candidates. Obama delivered his usual set of half truths and innuendo about McCain while deflecting discussion of critical problems with his proposed tax hikes, playing the same old tried worn out class warfare card declaring people who have succeeded financially as villains and everyone else as victims. McCain had a great line when he said he wanted a spending freeze across the board in all federally funded programs, God bless him for that.., and Obama naturally criticized that..., saying he would use a scalpel to stop spending in certain areas, which of course means he wants to increase spending in many places, which of course is fodder for his desire to raise taxes. Obama with a scalpel, that's a frightening image. He's the last person I'd ever trust to perform surgery. I would like to have seen McCain force Obama to talk about Richard Ayers, and his connections with ACORN, and his choice not to wear a US flag lapel pin, and his comment about bitter people clinging to guns and religion, how Biden questioned Obama's judgment when he said that Hillary might have been a better pick than himself for VP and how unfortunate it was that Obama passed up the opportunity to help women break that final glass ceiling, and how Obama supported a bill to educate kindergartners about sexually transmitted diseases, and how it could be that he had no knowledge of the hateful anti-American rhetoric spewed by his own pastor for 20 years while he attended that church. But, he didn't bring those topics up, unfortunately. Overall, McCain had the edge on experience and knowledge. I think that came through clearly.  McCain was good. But I also feel he could have done better.
 
- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE MARKET GOES UP - WILL OBAMA GO DOWN?

Bad news. The DOW Jones IA rose 266 points this morning, and no congressional bailiout was in place. Markets have posted a modest rebound despite lack of a bill passing the House.  The bad news is for Democrats. If markets show signs of self correction, then cries of woe about the economy will fall on increasingly deaf ears. Why is it that good economic news for all of us, is bad for the Democrat party? Because they are counting on disaster to make the case for change in the White House.  There's something sick, about rooting for a recession.
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE PROBLEM WITH PRESIDENT BUSH - WE OWN THIS ECONOMY - THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT

President Bush is a great man, and in the past has been a great leader for this nation in times of national crisis, such as the terror attacks on 9/11/2001.  President Bush loves this country and the people. When he took the oval office from Clinton I personally breathed a sigh of relief that we had integrity restored to the Presidency. For me to criticize President Bush , my opposition must be truly so strident that I can find no common ground with his stated policy. So it is... I have a profound practical and ideological disagreement with President Bush's approach to the resolution of some economic strife that has been causing some very large banks and finance companies to fall, or at least teeter on the brink. My world view is one of a Conservative approach to fiscal and social matters. When President Bush holds a conference in front of a window on the world and states that we are on the brink of disaster I have no doubt that he believes it. But when he tells us.. the people of the United States, that the disaster is the failure of banks that have made ( or been forced by bad regulations to make...) bad loan decisions..  and that there is no time to wait, debate, argue or discuss any other approach to fixing this problem excepting the direct infusion of 700+ billion dollars of this country's taxpayer money into a machine to be operated by one man, Secretary of the Treasury, to buy up bad/defaulted/foreclosed loans from private companies... I have to put my foot down on the brake. There is something intuitively wrong with that single-minded narrowly focused view of a fix. Conservatism demands a pull back and re-examination of this problem. An attempt has been made to frighten the nation into a rash, uncertain and ( in many people's opinion..) ill-advised move to trust the federal government to fix an economic fallout that as yet.... has not been "proven" to be without optional approaches, and has not been proven to be the end of the United States economy, and has not been proven to be beyond free market methods of correction. Everyone in this country is overtaxed. That includes those making over, and under, $250,000 a year. Congress can only do one thing, appropriate and spend money.  How much of it they spend, is up to you and me. That's right. We are not powerless mimes in a play being hosted by the federal government. Quite the opposite.  They don't go to Capitol Hill unless we give them permission. That's why our Senators and Representatives get very nervous when their phone lines start ringing off the hook with irate voters calling them, and thier email systems break down under a tidal wave of angry constituents making thier presence felt. They can go to DC and play with our tax money , but when we start putting the heat on them , reminding them that this is not a game..., it's a very sobering moment for them. That's one of the reasons, right now, that the proposed 700+ billion dollar bailout machine has stalled. Because "we" are mad as hell, and we're not going to let them get away with another government tax-funded boondoggle. The citizens of our country are ANGRY. WE are putting the squeeze on this deal by rattling the cages of our local representatives and letting them know we don't like this at all. The best alternative, in my opinion, is a complete elimination of the capital gains tax.  When our government no longer punishes you for making investment profits, investments will sky rocket like never before. Cut the payroll tax in half, and you will see new jobs grow like never before. There are so many positive, uplifting ways to move this economy without creating a new 700 billion dollar bureaucracy, and they all take the form of LESS GOVERNMENT involvement.
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

STAND UP LIKE A KNIGHT - OR RUN WITH THE DOGS

  The government has no right to grant any sort of bailout to private enterprise, let alone this 700 billion dollar boondoggle that is about to be approved. This spells disaster for the US economy. This will be the worst burden on US taxpayers since the nightmare of social security. This is a seminal moment for Senator McCain.  He has a chance , right now, to PROVE that he is a REFORMER. "Senator McCain, please REFUSE to put your name to any such monstrosity of a bailout". Senator McCain has been shouting from the rooftops... REFORM, REFORM, REFORM, I'M A REFORMER...We WILL REFORM WASHINGTON..., okay Senator... PROVE IT, RIGHT NOW! Stand on the side of Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and the other founding fathers of our country who would draw their swords before they would allow a such betrayal of the public trust as this 700 billion dollar nightmare. Stand on the side of the People... WE THE PEOPLE... the people as expressed by the preamble of the Constitution. You served your country nobly as a warrior sir, serve your country nobly now as a warrior among the politicians who represent business as usual. "Senator McCain, if you put your name to any legislation that approves of this burden on the taxpayer, then you sir are no reformer. You will be the same hypocritical, thieving jackal that sets himself up as a liege lord in DC and looks at the public tax money as a king looks at his personal treasure room. You know Senator, that we will never recover this money. Just like we never recover any such money the government dumps into the private sector to buy votes in an election cycle. Don't try to sell us on the same old lies that this is only temporary. NOTHING government sets up a bureaucracy for is temporary, and you KNOW it. If you sign anything approving this monstrosity, then DON'T YOU DARE... DON'T YOU DARE CALL YOURSELF A REFORMER!. You tout your record on earmarks..., big deal. If you sign on to this horror show you won't be able to make up for it by trimming earmarks from legislation sir. If you want to bail out the people being hurt in this economy then send that 700 billion dollars back to the people of the country who you took it from rather than setting up more debt and removing the responsibility from private businesses to manage thier resources wisely. if you want to REFORM something reform the role of the Treasurer who has far too much power.  Now is the time Senator McCain.  Do you stand up against politics as usual as a knight in shining armor, or do you get down on your hands and knees and run with the dogs?
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ATTACKING THE UNITED STATES ECONOMY

We don't need a President micro-managing the financial industries of the country. Any presidential candidate who ran on the basis of tampering with the operations of private financial institutions and money markets would not get my vote. If AIG can not rescue itself, let the company answer to its customers for its bad decisions and crash if it must. Will people suffer? Some probably will, there are alot of personal assets in big banking institutions, although some are covered by deposit insurance. Government must not take risk away from investment by playing the role of daddy to a wayward child who misspent its money. If you take risk away from normally risky investments you reduce the incentive to manage assests carefully.  Also the fundamentals of our economy are not ruled by three of four banks on wall street.  John McCain was exactly right. The country will continue to function, we will continue to prosper as a country in the big picture of things, and markets will correct themselves. He is smart not to rip the US economy because as a top contender for President everyone around the world is listening to what McCain says. If they think he will be President, and if he is mouthing that the economy sucks in the US he will turn international investors off like a light switch.  The President , as a leader, should be reassuring the country and the world that the US markets are sound and solid investments, not scaring people out of thier wits. What will also debilitate the economy in a widespread form is Obama's plan for raising taxes, especially on capital gains. If you want boost economic activity , lower taxes on all businesses and families to provide more capital and disposable income to generate greater commerce and investment.
 
Secondly, I wish McCain would stop using Sarah Palin to deliver his liberalized message on increasing regulations on CEO's and big Oil and oversight on private banks and investment firms, and instead let her be the Conservative voice on pushing for oil and natural gas exploration, cutting taxes and promoting Conservative values to our nations court systems. I don't think McCain realizes what Sarah's best asset to his campaign is and how to make the best use of her popularity.  He should not be sending Sarah Palin out to talk about increasing regulations and bureaucracies.
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IF OBAMA WINS - PACK UP YOUR BUSINESSES AND RUN

John McCain and Barack Obama have called a one day truce on criticism in honor of memorializing 9/11/2001.  That's fine, but I have no such compunction to restrict my opinions about Barack Obama on any given day that he continues to be the Presidential Candidate of the Democrat Party whose policies will harm this country. In fact I think today is a particularly poignant day to point out why Obama's policies will endanger our country and leave us more vulnerable if he becomes President. First, let me say that I agree with Senator Joe Biden.  Hillary would have been a better pick for Obama as VP, than himself. ( Indeed I suspect the Obama camp now regrets choosing Biden).  Now..., I will refer to the startling idiocy of Obama's economic ideas as evidenced by a 2007 piece of legislation he supported. In August of 2007 Barack Obama and two Senate co-sponsors introduced a repressive bill to the Senate called the Patriot Employer Act. Nice sounding title eh? It's got that word "Patriot" in there. Sort of makes you think it's something that supports strengthening the foundations of our national security and economy.  Well, forget it. The bill was designed to "encourage" US companies to abide by the sponsor's dubious definition of "Patriotism". What does Obama define as "patriotism"?...well... here we go. Obama's favored economic bill defined a Patriotic business as one that pays at least 60% of all employees health insurance premiums, makes no attempt to dissuade union organizing drives, Keeps the same number or more..., of active employees domestically in the US relative to the amount of people they hire for any international locations of thier business, pay every single employee at least as much as what the federal government chooses to define as the "poverty level" for a family of 3, and must provide a pension plan for all employees. And what do these businesses get for falling in line with the bill's definition of Patriotism?  A 1% tax break on thier annual profits.  
Whoop-de-doo. Now, here's the kicker. To finance the 1% tax credit, if you run a US company  with sites overseas then... "Ta da" ... you have to pay the US tax rate on profits earned in those international locations, rather than the local tax rate of those countries. This amounts to a massive tax increase for any  companies with international locations. You can read the text of the legislation at the following library of congress web page;  http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:1:./temp/~mdbshE5fec::
 
- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA WORRIES ABOUT MCCAIN'S HOMES


Recently Barack Obama suggested that John McCain was out of touch for being uncertain of how many properties he owned. So, it's come down to this. Obama has not been able to find an issue to attack McCain on that will gain him back momentum that he's been losing in the polls, so he decides to play the role of a whiny snot-nosed brat and in a shrill and silly overly-dramatic and poorly acted tone complain that McCain is out of touch because between John McCain and his wife Cindy they own 7 houses. McCain responded by pointing out Obama's lack of judgement by allowing Rezco to do him a favor by buying the adjacent property ( that was required as part of the sale of the house Obama purchased) then sell him a small part of the property back, enabling Obama to buy his house at much less than it would have cost him.. Not illegal..., but the problem with it was it highlighting his long time association with the now-convicted ( of fraud and bribery) Tonzy Rezco. The Democrats are expert at dividing the country via class envy tactics. Obama started this little battle by making a big deal out of something that is not. I thought Obama was portraying himself as a different kind of candidate, a different kind of politician..., a uniter..., someone bringing people together, above the fray of attack politics.... of course that was a load of garbage as we see from his silly, childish attack on John McCain because McCain couldn't recall how many properties he owns. Being financially successful doesn't mean that you can't understand how economic fluctuations can effect people of middle or lower income. Hmmm... let's see...  who was it on the Democrat side who claimed himself to be the champion of the poor.  John Edwards.  Check his bank account, his 10,000 sqaure foot mansion., etc. The notion that a person who has a lot of money can't represent politically someone who doesn't is ludicrous.  By that way of thinking, a man can't be the political representative of any woman, because he's not a woman and therefore can't relate.  Or a black person can't represent a white person, because he's not white and can't understand the "white" perpsective. or vice versa. It's an intellectually vacant argument. It shows that Obama is desperate. He is reaching for one of the oldest attack plays in liberal democrat handbook. Class envy. If you are not  "rich" ( debatable what that means) then the Democrats want you to mistrust, discredit, and feel abused by those who are "rich". Unless it's a "rich" Democrat, of course.
 
- Mike Silverman.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »