About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

OBAMA LOYALISTS CHEERED THE "PIG" COMMENT

 

We can consider whether the "lipstick on a pig..." comment Obama made was a backhanded or coded insult meant for Governor Palin, which frankly is kind of hard to rationalize. Obama obviously stepped in it with that stupid metaphor but I want to point something out. Listen carefully to the tape as he makes the analogy, the crowd was quiet until he uttered the words "lipstick on a pig..." at that moment, when he said "Pig"... the crowd began to cheer and scream thier approval. I really, truly honestly think "THEY" decided to make the connection in thier minds to Sarah Palin. It's rather obvious, even if Obama didn't mean it to be taken that way... you know that's why the Obama loyalists loved it. They loved it because they despise Sarah Palin because of her effectiveness and they want to see her muddied up, they want to see her cut down and will take any red meat they can get even if it's only thier own twist on a stupid comment.

- Mike Silverman, Milford MA

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOW TO HANDLE THE "LIPSTICK ON A PIG" COMMENT

A lot of fur is flying over Obama's recent comment "You can put lipstick on a pig, It's still a pig.", in his metaphor for the McCain campaign's claim about reforming DC. Sure.., it can easily be taken as an attack on Governor Palin. But that's the easy knee-jerk way to take it. It's joining Obama on the low road to demand an apology for the words, and it accepts the premise that we must only allow politically correct speech as defined by liberals. What needs to be pointed out in this is that Barack Obama has dispensed with his high level rhetoric once and for all, and proven that he is "NOT" articulate when he's backed into a corner. He's desperate, lashing out with low brow metaphors. Now if Obama was thinking... he would have realized that this would be misinterpreted as an attack on Palin by a significant number of people. He was not thinking and it was evident. What we need to do is just point out how he's jumped feet-first into the mud of attack politics, hipocritically ignoring his own vow to keep above the fray, to run a different kind of campagin without negativity. In his own words, on Obama's own campaign web site he states the following... "They said we wouldn't have a chance in this campaign unless we resorted to the same old negative attacks. But we resisted, even when we were written off, and ran a positive campaign that pointed out real differences and rejected the politics of slash and burn." .  Obama has thrown his own words out the window, putting the lie to his so-called positive campaign. What does this mean?  It means that McCain's rising success has Obama rattled like a loose pencil in a tin box and now that he percieves that he actually might not win this.., all bets are off and the claws and the mud are being brought out. Is this the "change" Obama claims to be bringing to DC?  There's nothing new about Obama's brand of politics, and he proves it every day now.
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »