About Me

Name: Mike Silverman
Location: Milford, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

FEVERED FANTASIES

Being President is hard.  When I was a little kid, I was as naive and immature about what the President does as any kid was.  I would say "I'm going to be President and make it so that 10 year olds can drive!", or "I'll make all amusement parks free!", or "I'll stop all the wars and give everyone a house and thier own free doctor for when they get sick!" or "I'll make all the world our friends by being nice to everyone!". Yes, those were the golden days of youth, when wide-eyed thoughts of the President as some sort of magician who could wave a wand and make everything the way he wants it..., passed by and truth eventually filtered in. The truth , of course, being that the President isn't serving himself and living in a fantasy land where his dreams are his to make real.  But, some people never get past that fantasy stage, thinking of the Presidency as some sort of mystical throne where upon sitting you suddenly have the ability to will your dreams into reality and that it's all about you, all about what you want and making wishes come true like wandering through Disneyland. It's sad to see a person ascend to that high office who still clings to that silly naive cartoonish image of what a President is.
 
Now we come to the fevered fantasies of the trancontinental lie of man-made global warming. We should celebrate the exposure of the hoax of man-made global warming by eating a big trans-fat soaked burger. Now, the laments will be multiplied 10-fold by the cornered and desperate liars who have no facts except in the fevered fantasies that boil up in their scheming little brain cells. The outrage from these kooks is real. VERY real. Because, you see, no one with a single shred of credibility is ever, EVER, supposed to question their witch's brew of crap science that they stir up in the name of the public good, the fake research and phony cure for which is supposed to be funded...of course... by us the hapless taxpayers. Anyone with credibility who questions the "science" of phony science is supposed to be cast down with aspersions by the media and politicans as agenda-driven know-nothings who are unqualified to comment. When it's the promoters of junk science who need to be scruitinized. There was a time when the press operated with skeptisicm. They used to insist that someone prove what they say before they would print it. But now it's just the opposite. As long as what you have to say fits the liberal talking points mold, you are given instant credibility by the very people who should be suspicious of you, and WOULD have been suspicious of you in the world of 20 or 30 years ago. Now, anyone who uses real facts to question liberal fantasy science are considered castouts, stoned by the media, evil people who are trying to stand in the way of good-intentioned liars. All the hoax-science that exists should be exposed. Why dont junk scientists ever come up with one of their typically stupid theories that could help people? Like maybe "Burning fossil fuels enriches the soil" or "smoking kills the N1H1 virus" or "the ingesting of trans-fats promotes a healthy colon" or "polar bears are great for steak sandwiches".
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RE-DECLARING OUR INDEPENDENCE

 
The Declaration of Independence: ( WITH NOTES ADDED BY ME... in parenthesis)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal... ( this includes the executives at AIG, the management and employees of Wal Mart, speculators in the stock market, and people at all income levels from the wealthiest to those with no income)...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life ( abortion is not a "right") , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness ( the amount of money at your disposal increases the ease at which you can pursue liberty and happiness, thus the more you are taxed the more the government chokes your options for such pursuits) .--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ...( our government is not there to rule us, we own it, it functions at our discretion and we will reign it in when it goes too far)..., --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,...( ...when our government tries to determine the fate, future and obligations of the people and forgets that it's role is to serve rather than to limit freedom...) it is the Right of the People to alter ...( elect new leaders)... or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes ( .. the Constitution must not be ignored as a matter of convenience )...; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government( ... or perhaps restore to primary importance the founding principles and guiding documents of a great Republic to govern as was the original intent by replacing corrupt leaders with those who respect the Constitution)... The history of the present King of Great Britain ...( or perhaps... the present political leaders in DC )..is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.

 This first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence lays out the basic reasons for pursuing redress of grievances against a government that has gone out of control.  My notes inserted into it were meant simply to point out the modern equivalence of some of those grievances. It seems that  far too many of our elected leaders have forgotten or forsaken the principles and ideas of our nation's founding. We have a governing body now that seems to have lost its way from the principles primarily embodied in the right to liberty. Freedom. From freedom all the rest of it becomes possible.
 
- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IT'S AS BAD AS WE IMAGINED...

  As you recall, in recent months every time a spending program or bill was announced , the market dropped.  Every time Obama or anyone in the senate or Treasury announced plans to prop up industries with TARP, the market went south.  We need to very carefully examine what might be causing a fluctuation or rally, and realize also that consumer confidence is fickle to the point where the wrong words coming out of Obama's or Pelosi's or Reid's or Frank's mouths could send investors pulling back.  Also, companies have plans to deal with drops in market value and plans for boosting sales. Let's not rule out the private sector's ability to take the initiative to turn numbers around.  Recessions historically have rebounds and it would be unfortunate to assume that the governments attempts at socialistic take over of banks and over the top spending on things like universal health care and cap and trade and a litany of other things is what makes an economy sound and raises confidence.  It's rather the opposite.  It remains to be seen what becomes of any rally in the markets and what exactly is moving the consumer indexes. Government intervention tends to make investors frightened, and past moves by the administration and congress proves that wall street does not respond well to them. How, for example, does an investor know if or when AIG ( now AIU? ) is in the black because of sound business decisions or simply because of TARP funds covering thier debts? We may never, EVER, again have any reason to be confident in AIG.  Look at what has happened to the poor shmucks working there. They have been savaged by personal attacks from the President on down to Barney Frank and have had death threats launched at employees. They have had a horrific media blitz that increased in savagery since they were propped up by TARP. The reputation of AIG has been burned at the stake like they used to burn witches in old England, by the very people who said it was too big to fail. This is very sick stuff. Do you think.. right now... that the people who owned and operated AIG are now wishing they had gone through chapter 11?  I think they definitely would have been far, far better off and I think they all know it.  I think there's a real question mark on the Obama administration now as to whether Obama et-al actually knows what they are doing or even cares what happens in the markets. Yes, we have to wonder. Does the behavior and approach of this administration really show that they have any concern about the market? Looked at realistically, the answer is no. The goal of the administration seems to be obtaining and holding the power to micromanage the country's economy regardless of who it crushes in the process so that IT can decide what is fair and who the winners and losers in our society should be.  It is a totalitarian approach to central planning that has got to be making quite a few Obama voters scratch thier heads as they ask themselves, is this really what we voted for?
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CRAWLING OUT OF THE DARKNESS....

We are not amused Mr. President, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Reid and Mr. Frank.  All the vitriol and hatered you are spewing at the AIG Corporation is not going to distract us from the fact that you have just spent this country into bankruptcy for the foreseeable future and accomplished nothing in the process. Your hypocritical ranting and raving at "executives" and bonuses is not going to make us forget about your socialist agenda to seize control of the healthcare industry, the banking industry, to force economically unsound environmental policies on businesses that will raise costs for all Americans, your rollback of laws designed to keep us safe from terrorism, and your irresponsible continuation of the banking regulations that required a percentage of loans to be granted to those who could not afford them.

Obama has , up to very recently, been ripping down the economy and saying that government is "the only one" that can fix it. He didn't actually disown that statement yet, that only government can fix it...  ( though he should reverse that idea )... but, trying to suddenly put a positive spin on the economy makes him come off as either hypocritical or a bit suspicious. When a politician "says" one thing and "acts" in the opposite manner, we have a leader who does not believe in his own words, and that is not a good thing.  Obama needs to back up his statement about people staying positive about the economy by showing that "he" is positive about the economy by stopping all government bailouts and letting the market go through natural corrections based on capitalism, and simply and plainly remove barriers to freedom by cutting taxes across the board and letting people keep more of thier own money and thus boost consumption to new heights. If he did that, I would be cheering him on. but he's not doing that. We know he won't do that, because he doesn't really believe in a free market system and wants to control the economic outcome of everyone's lives so that he, in his own mind, can play the hero , can play the savior of the country and institute the sort of socialist ideas he deeply believes in.  Recessions are cyclical and it will turn around regardless of Obama's and Pelosi's and Reid's hideous spending and ... , when it does eventually turn around Obama and his cohorts will lie about it by saying it was his stimulus package that caused the economy to rebound when in fact the so-called stimulus probably will be the cause of a "delay" in the economy rebounding.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S PUPPET MASTERS

I observed, from the time of his rising through the primaries, that the biggest liberals in government were rushing out to praise and endorse Obama over Hillary Clinton. Initially that struck me as a bit odd. My theory was that the Clinton's made some political enemies in thier own party by being such dominating figures.  I think that is absolutley true  now and i am really convinced that this is what carried Obama into office.  Much as I disagree with both the Clinton's political views, they both knew how to play the middle of the road and how to keep the ultra liberal left wing of thier party from going overboard. I think , people like Ted kenedy, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry.. etc.. extemist liberals who were playing up Obama early on... saw a useful fool in Obama. They saw a puppet who could be a tool of the ultra left wing socialists to drive thier agenda through congress.  It strikes me that this is coming home to roost now.  President Obama is fast draining the political capital that carried him into office with grossly out of proportion spending bills that even those with little to no economic background can clearly see is not a good thing. There is rising anger across the country at the tidal wave of spending. I think we are seeing the lack of experience rearing its head. I suspect..., that Obama is thoroughly overwhelmed with the task of being President and is so caught up in the  volitile pressures of security, economy, and foriegn affairs..., a hideous pressure that all Presidents face...the like of which he never really understood till he got into position... that he is not capable of stepping back to analyze the impact of his own drive to get all these big liberal agenda items accomplished. And I think that is exactly what the hard core leftists in congress want. They want him as thier rubber stamp and they bascially have accomplished that.  I think... part of the reason for the rushing of the big ticket liberal economic bills through congress is because he is getting pressure from the elitist constituent groups and politicians who propped him up during his campaign and are expecting payback. Also, he does believe in central planning. Obama is a big government liberal and the idea of big government control comes naturally to him. But I also think..., he's being manipulated to some degree by puppet masters around him who are much more experienced and have big socialist agends they want to see happen.  I never thought Obama was ready to be President, and I think he's proving it.  I don't think we have a president who is in control.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA BECOMES DON CORLEONE

The reason some corporate executives are playing both sides of the coin, standing up for Conservative fiscal policy and then bizzarely praising Obama is not hard to figure out. Obama has become a thug. Every bailout has been used by Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, etc..., as extortion for taking control of those businesses. This is almost like loan sharking. It's insidious. It's like some shady guy in a trenchcoat stepping out of a dark alley and whispering in your ear, "hey, buddy, I hear you're having money problems... well... I can help". And you basically sign your life away to him in exchange for financial help. Is this what Obama voters wanted? Is this Hope and Change? Is it the business of our government to be a thug to private businesses and to people who make over 250K? Think about the role reversal that is going on here. The US federal government descends from the people, it is owned and operated by you and me. But, with the current trend, with the outrageous spending and taxing, the elected representatives of the people have taken on a new vision for our government, a vision whereby the body of our government represents our parents, and we are mere children being given an allowance, and being spanked and sent to the stand in corner for daring to question it's authority. You know, everyone saw what happened to "Joe the plumber" when he said he didn't like Obama's plans. No one wants to be attacked by the highest sitting political leader in the world with the resources at his fingertips to litterally destroy a person's life, and Obama and his team has proven they will do so if it means shutting down voices of opposition that might be taken seriously.
 
I've been trying to put this administration and congress into a perspective that boils it down to it's goals and ideology overall. What I observe, is that the leaders in power in our federal government right now have become an adversary of the people, of the foundational documents of our nation, and of the greater vision of our founding fathers. Our government is fighting us. Obama et-al are throwing punches at our way of life, while trying to convince us that every punch we take is good for us, and strengthens us, while the real goal of our adversary is to weaken us , the masses, until we give up and admit we are a defeated bunch of misanthropes. Never, I don't think in all of our history, has such a fluid abomination as the wilful destruction of capitalism and self determination been put forward as it is now. Obama once said "we are the ones we've been waiting for", well, let's modify that to realistically fit his administration. "We have met the enemy, and he is us". That should be the Obama slogan for his administration. He is an enemy of the American way of life. But elections have consequences.  And we now face what the majority elected.
 
We could say that Reagan was an actor who made you believe he was sincere about his view of the country whenever he spoke, and he was... he was always genuine. Obama is not an actor but he puts on an act whenever he speaks, complete with a script and cue cards. He is such a poser as President, he is running the exeuctive branch as if it were a branch of ACORN. I think obama voters are beginning to peer into his mask and see something they don't like. It's stunning how much socialism has been rammed into legislation since he took office. It is overwhelming and it is so destructive that even Obama voters can not help but notice.
 
Just one more thing, I'm all for our political leaders promoting a positive view and inspiring people toward consumption, BUT as I recall McCain was lambasted, broiled, fried, and served up like sushi by Obama, his cronies, and everyone in the media for daring to say that the fundamentals of our economy are sound. Obama recently saying ( paraphrasing...) that we should trust in most our financial institutions and that most have conducted sound fiscal policies and that in some basic ways our economy is okay, sounds STRIKINGLY similar. But he will , of course, get a pass on it that McCain did not. I beleive McCain was actually forced to apologize for his "insensitivity" for remarking on the same thing that Obama basically just said. The difference is, I think McCain really did and does have faith in the strength of the American work ethic, and Obama is just talking to hear himself sound Presidential because many pundits were asking why he doesn't present a more positive and inspirational view for our economy, and he doesn't actually mean a single word of it.
 
Every day I check real estate listings on my local areas to track prices and trends, looking at investment properties. About twice a month for the past 6 months, almost without fail, home owners have been kocking 5 to 10 percent off the price of thier homes in a desperate attempt to sell. A beautiful townhouse across the street from me started off at 289K about 6 months ago, it just sold at 244K. Now here's the thing. There are plenty of people who would have loved to have that house. And it would have sold much sooner and for much closer to the original asking price, if disposable income was in greater command for the consumer. This is not rocket science, really. It's not hard. If .... I know this is a radical thought... but if , instead of baling out banks, all tax paying consumers were given a 20% cut in federal income tax, and capital gains was cut by just 20%, if more disposable assests , more liquid assets were left in the hands of the consumer... buying and selling would skyrocket. There would be a swift correction and markets would rise to new heights. It's so simple. More money in your pocket, more opportunity to buy the things you want and/or need. But we now face massive spending that too many people are just rolling over for. What happened to government taking the burden OFF of people? Cutting the tax burden is such a simple idea, there should be no cloudiness in the minds of the masses, but Obama's administration works to put those clouds up there
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK OBAMA IS A HERO

Barack Obama, you are a hero to all the great carnival barkers who ever sold a ten cent ticket to a scam sideshow. When I consider the greatest men in the history of our country who have held the office of President, none can claim the one great trait you bring to that most noble of political "houses".  And that trait is....nothing. You have proven that there is no resume needed for leadership of the free world, other than for being in the opposite party during a weak economy. To all the people who have no experience in their jobs, no qualifying background that provides a basis for promotion, you are an inspiration.  In a business world sense, you have leapt from being an entry-level clerk, to being CEO , with no internship in between. You did it by selling empty promises and vague notions of hope and change while providing no clear plan for success. You are an advertising firm's dream come true. For those of us who bought pet rocks, mood rings, hoola hoops and chia pets, voting for you has been the culmination of our national obsession with fads and gimmicks. You are the closet space saver, the super steak knife set, the miracle juicer and the vacuum-seal plastic bowl set of our Presidential hopes. And like so many of those gimmicks that wear thin and end up being far less than we hoped for, you too will satisfy the fad requirement of diminishing our expectations and souring our optimism. Decades from now when a new generation looks back on past Presidents, your election to the Presidency will be remembered in the same way we remember any fad...., with a nostalgic, somewhat embarrassed smile and shake of the head in wonderment that we could ever have done something so silly.
 
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE SHOE GAME - STARRING PRESIDENT BUSH

President Bush has faced many hard trials and tests during his time in office.  Some doofus Iraqi throwing his shoes at the President hardly compares to things he has faced in the past. A real entrepreneur could take that whole shoe-throwing incident and make a profit. I can envision a computer game, or a video game called Shoe-Down at the Baghdad Corral. The player of the game would take the role of the President, and during a press conference in Baghdad a disgruntled Iraqi reporter starts tossing shoes at you.  You have to duck and dodge the shoes, everything from sandals and loafers to spike heels, but you have the ability to use the presidential seal as a shield to block the shoes and a number of acrobatic moves such as back flips and somersaults to avoid being hit.  The goal is for you to keep ducking , dodging and deflecting the shoes until the slow moving secret service agents eventually reach and tackle the Iraqi reporter. You can take a certain amount of hits from the flying shoes, but get hit too many times and your lose the game and have to retire from the Presidency to become a shoe salesman for Al-Jazeera brand footware. Win the game, and you will receive the glorious title of SOLE SURVIVOR!
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DUMP CLINTON - AND LET GENERAL MOTORS FALL ON ITS OWN

On September 24th President Bush publicly stated "We are in the midst of a serious financial crisis. Our entire economy is in danger.The market is not functioning properly." As a result of high pressure tactics and big government intervention, we got the reviled "bailout" bill. And it is still reviled today. It did nothing to prevent job loss, except among the executives of certain specific companies, it did nothing to "stabilize the markets" as indicated by the still gyrating swings of the DOW. You know, we might have had a teachable moment here for congress, but they didn't get the message.  The government can't take control of the economy, and win. That should have been the message congress got out of it. Taking over the economy.., failed when they tried it in the Soviet Union and eventually became a factor in it's downfall, it's failing in China which is why they are moving toward open markets, it eventually fails everywhere it's tried. Why can't congress make it work?  Because.., the government does not control the US economy.  Therefore the government can not correct downswings in the market. The government has some tools at it's disposal that can influence economic conditions, such as lowering taxes.. and in combination with the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates can be a major spark in growth, but the government does not... CAN NOT.... determine the success of our country's businesses. It NEVER has. Since our country's founding, the free market enterprise system has been the determination of business success.   Now Obama is saying the same thing Bush said back in September, only this time it's about the auto industry and middle America. There's an old saying, Fool Me Once, Shame on YOU.... Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me.  If the congress is fooled again into voting for another vile bailout bill, they will have proven thier national foolishness, proven to be an international embarrassment and a waste of taxpayer money for thier salaries, and every one of them who votes for it doesn't deserve to be re-elected. Its tragic that so many people are losing thier jobs, but sometimes it's the only way trim the waste in companies and allow them to survive. Because you lose one job, doesn't mean you can't turn around and start looking for another.  I've had to do it myself several times when companies I've worked for went under financially.  I went to the nearest temp work agency and took the first job I was qualified for.  I held on and bided time until I could get back into a corporate position similar to what I had before. It is simply not American to whine and moan and beg the Government for a hand out when you lose a job. You get out there and do the best you can, like so many people are trying to do right now. 
 
As for Hillary Clinton for Secretary Of State..., Obama could do a LOT better. Hillary is basically worthless on her own . She used her husband to get herself into a viable political position, clinging to his name to get elected in NY, and all through her campaign for the nomination hoping that he could sell her to the public, a man who is a proven philandering dog in so many ways, including soiling the oval office , still accused by Anita Broderick of rape, an absolute slime of a man who was impeached by the House Of  Representatives for lying under oath,  and she stays with him out of weakness, fearful that she will lose connections if she dumps him. She's shrill, doesn't understand the issues that most citizens care about, look at her ignorant response to the issue over driver's licenses for illegals. I think she's a terrible politician who brings nothing to the table except her husband's name, she should go back to doing the only thing she's any good at, being a lawyer.
 

- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE AROMA OF EXCREMENT

The excrement is being spread thick by the Obama media. The latest meat being added to the bull sandwich is that Obama is a great Lincoln-esqe leader because he is reaching out to rivals to be on his Presidential cabinet. The Associated Press has a perfumed cake of fluff reporting on this that's so syrupy it would make even a sugar junkie vomit. The AP..., interviewing Doris Goodwin ,(  who wrote a book about Lincoln and his cabinet ), quoted her saying this; "I think it reflects a great inner strength on Obama's part that he is seriously considering creating a team of rivals as Lincoln did,".  That is a jam packed load of grade A baloney. Who is this great rival that Obama is reaching out to for a cabinet position?  Hillary Clinton. A senator who agrees with every political position he holds. Big deal. She offers no diversity of opinion, and this works only to his benefit anyway if he does it. And the article points to him making Joe Biden, a one time primary election rival, his running mate. WOW.  What a gutsy move! Bull. It was in fact move made from weakness because he needed someone to shore-up his lack of foriegn policy knowledge, and it was a media blooper-fest as he had to suffer the embarrassment of Biden's unrivaled stupidity on the stump.  If Obama wants diversity let him ask Newt Gingrich to be his Secretary of State, and Mitt Romney to be Secretary Of the Treasury, then i'll consider that he's actually seeking a diverse cabinet.
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S THE GREATEST - LINDSAY LOHAN'S A RACIST

 He hasn't even taken the oath of office yet, and Obama is already the greatest president the country has ever had. At least you would think so from all the adoring love stories the press has been printing and vocalizing over the past week since he won the election. In fact , I've found none.. zip , zero, that have anything at all negative to report about Obama. Here's what I've read, Obama will be the greatest bi-partisan President ever, as shown by his desire to bring on board more than just one Republican to his cabinet, as long as they agree with his world view. And much is being made of his sending Jim Leach ( former Republican rep ) along with Madeline Albright to represent him at the Global economic summit. Leach supported and endorsed Obama's candidacy. So much for Leach being a Republican. Fox is headlining a puff piece on how the Obama's will decorate the White House. Yawn. Humorously, a report has surfaced that the US Secret Service has set up a code name of "Renegade" for Barack Obama. Yes, that's fitting. Though no word on what inspired that code name. MSNBC suggests that Obama's decision to hold "tough" unconditional talks with Iran could help ease tensions between the US and Iran. ( how do you hold a "tough" talk when you base the talk on no conditions?) And then... there's this. According to the New Republic, DC economists and Democrat party members are urging Obama to "scale back" his plans for any sort of tax cut, in response to the "Economic emergency". This, I assume, is the same economic emergency that existed a few weeks ago while Obama was pledging ( ahem ) to cut taxes for 95% of working Americans. Suddenly, the emergency is such that he may need to hold back on that for a while. SO we are told. Now, I'd like a show of hands from the Movement Conservatives... how many people knew this was coming? Good. You can all put your hands down now. Of course, Obama isn't quite in office yet. So we're safe for at least another two months, until Obama's first batch of official executive orders hits the street. Here's a fun sidebar.., poor Lindsay Lohan ( an obama supporter, of course) referred to Obama as our first "colored president" , for which she was chided as having used racist language. I don't suspect Lindsay is a racist, and I'm sure it was just an innocent remark. But she just learned that speech is not free if you have liberal leaders. I guess this means the NAACP ( National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) is a racist organization.

- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IT'S TIME TO BE PATRIOTIC TOWARD OBAMA

It's great how big hearted the liberal media can be when Bush is leaving and the Democrats hold all the power, calling Bush "gracious" in his meeting with Obama.  But gee... I wonder. During the transition will we see Michelle Obama kicking the White House travel office staff out into the parking lot like Hillary did? Will we see general thievery and destruction of property in the White House by Bush administration staffers like the Clinton staffers committed? Removing the "B" from all the keyboards perhaps, like the Clinton staff removed the "w"'s? Stolen fixtures, doorknobs, computers, telephones with missing numbers, overturned furniture, telephone lines pulled from the walls, offices left in a general state of trashing, desk drawers emptied, writing on the walls, and voice mail greetings that had obscene messages. All of this according to an investigation by the Genral Accounting Office on the condition of the White House left by the Clinton administration during transition. Will we see any of this? And if so, will Obama generously refer to it as "just a couple of pranks, but now it's time to move forward..".. as Bush very generously described it, or would there be outrage by an Obama administration and cries for investigation and prosecution? We will see a smooth, generous and professional transition of Power because we have a man of impeccable character as President currently. George Bush is a gentleman and good person. Also, I thought it was the liberal media and Pelosi and Ried and the rest of the typical liberal suspects, who said that opposing the President is patriotic? That what they said when we complained about them opposing the President on the Iraq surge.., so how dare they criticize any of us for being critical of Obama now?  We are merely being patriotic , by thier own standards. In fact, I think every person should show thier patriotism by railing against the rise of the Obama administration and calling for his resignation, even before he takes office. Let's get very very patriotic. 
 
- Mike Silverman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AN INCREMENTAL DESTRUCTION OF FREEDOM

That it's even being considered to bail out the auto industry ( again ), is a crime against the founding principles of our country, and puts the government ( and thus the nation)  squarely onto the slippery slope of fascism, in fact at this point we have already fully engaged a part of our economy in fascist measure, with the tether of the lone rope keeping us from falling into the black hole below fraying at the edges. You must realize what it means to have the government taking ownership of formerly private industries. Does the name Hugo Chavez ring a bell?  For "the good of the country" he took away private ownership of all oil companies in Venezuela. There is a theory called incrementalism, which states that the masses will accept anything if it is done gradually, allowing slow acclimation by the public.  We are THERE. We are in the midst of incremental government takeover, inch-by-inch,  of any industry on which the wealth of the nation is measured. The only brake we have is the right to vote, and possibly the Supreme Court, if it will intervene in this ..., which is itself questionable. The right to vote has proven USELESS in this past election cycle since the masses have voted in the most liberal president in history and given him a majority party control of the congress. The blindness of the public eye to the incrementalism of the weakening of free market capitalism is ASTOUNDING. Not that McCain would have been a lot better, after all he voted to allow Paulson to do the ridiculous things he's done so far with his multi-billion dollar budget. This is why we need genuine Conservatives to win the positions of power in our government, to stop this incremental destruction of our system of capitalism and economic freedom.
   
- Mike Silverman, Milford MA
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FRANKENSTEIN AND THE SUPREME HILLARY

Camelot, Camelot, Camelot.  All you hear now is whispers about Obama recreating the "Camelot" administration of Kennedy. With his views, JFK would be kicked out of the Democrat party today, the way Joe Lieberman was. He would probably be a Republican. Besides, it's obvious the Democrats don't realize that the story of King Arthur and Camelot was a tragedy. Arthur's Lady Guinevere cheated on him with his best friend Lancelot who he banished from Camelot, then Arthur went crazy and sent all his knights on a futile quest to find the Holy Grail. Instead of referring to the Obama presidency as "Camelot" we should call it "Ingolstadt", the Bavarian town where Victor Frankenstein created his monster. Also, I heard Lanny Davis on the news today suggesting that Obama might appoint Hillary Clinton to a position on the Supreme Court.  God help us.  Is this what the Obama voters really wanted?

- Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FREEDOM GOES ON A BUMPY RIDE

There are generally two schools of thought regarding bullies. The first approach is to take them head-on and show them you will not tolerate being abused. The other approach is to ignore them, don't feed thier ego, and eventually they give up. It's been soundly proven that the second approach is almost always an abysmal failure. Ignoring the bully either entices him to be even more brazen in his attacks, or it appears to give the bully credibility since you won't defend yourself..., or both. So why bring this up? Sarah Palin has been bullied by the press, by Hollywood, by every Democrat pundit, from nearly the very first day that McCain announced her as his choice for a running mate. Her children, her husband, her stature as a mother, her intelligence, have been ridiculed in the way a mindless bully attempts to ridicule who he perceives to be the most defenseless target on the playground. As a politician a certain amount of this comes with the job, and you have to allow it to roll off your back..., to a degree. But there comes a time when it's reached its limit and the bullies need to be taught a lesson. When people who were on your side are turned against you launching the most petty, snide, cowardly, immature attacks from deep in the shadows, helping your enemies to tear you down, it's time to go after those traitors. Senator McCain proves again he is an absolutely bitter ingrate and a waste of time, as he sits idly by allowing lies from his own campaign staffers to be tossed at Governor Palin. Why? Because he never liked Conservatives and thinks they are the problem with the Republican Party. Sarah Palin worked harder than McCain himself in the last nine weeks of the campaign, to try to get him elected. And everyone I know thinks it's also disgraceful that Fox News drools this garbage all over it's network without first waiting for a response from governor Palin so that it can be presented as a fair and balanced report. Cameron should be fired for his hack journalism in aiding this spreading of innuendo and lies and violating the credo of his own network's slogan of fair and balanced.

Also have you heard of Obama's plan to force all public school students to perform community service? This is the sort of thing courts punish criminals with. Obama wants to do this to students. Obama said... "So when I'm President, I will set a goal for all American middle and high school students to perform 50 hours of service a year, and for all college students to perform 100 hours of service a year. This means that by the time you graduate college, you'll have done 17 weeks of service.". So what is this supposed to be, Obama's forced labor camps? Will the students have to wear t-shirts with Obama's image on them while they perform thier forced labor? What's next? Every school room must have a portrait of Obama on the wall that the students have to salute? Looks like we better hold on tight. The Obama presidency is going to be a very bumpy ride for those who cherish freedom.

 - Mike Silverman

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »